Gelman Family Law Lawyers

Over 200+ 5-Star Google Reviews

Book Consult

Father Regrets Signing Minutes Of Settlement; But Can He Convince The Courts To Overturn?

Published: May 14, 2019

Book Consult1-844-736-0200

Table of Contents

Father Regrets Signing Minutes Of Settlement; But Can He Convince The Courts To Overturn?

Back in April we looked at a case where the courts refused to overturn a separation agreement entered into by two parents. Another recent decision, this time from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, highlights just how important it is to carefully consider the details and implications of a separation agreement before signing it.

The separation history

The mother and father began living together in 1995 and separated in 2008. They did not every marry. They had two children, aged 21 and 19 at the time of the hearing. They both attend university. The couple signed their first separation agreement on January 12, 2011.

In 2018 the mother brought a motion to change, and it resulted in a temporary order where the father consented to paying child support and s.7 expenses. The order contained a clause where the father acknowledged he was not proceeding with a claim for “undue hardship” and that “neither party shall be required, at any future time, to disclose the income or asset position of their new partners with whom they cohabit.”

The couple entered into mediation, which resulted in a Minutes of Settlement dated January 14, 2019. The court describes the Minutes of Settlement as having “dealt with the (father’s) support arrears and provided a formula to calculate the parties’ proportionate contributions to the children’s post-secondary educational expenses. In the event of a material change in circumstances related to tuition and fee costs, the parties contributions could be varied by way of submissions to (the mediator). The parties agreed that they would not be liable to contribute to the children’s post-secondary education costs beyond a first degree or 5 years of post-secondary education, whichever came first.” The Minutes of Settlement also contained the clauses in the temporary order, restricting the father from pursuing claims of undue hardship or seeking disclosure of any new partners’ income or assets.

A change of heart

Just three months after signing the Minutes of Settlement, the father brought a motion for summary judgment. His request called for a retroactive reduction of s.7 expenses on the basis of undue hardship. He also sought to receive financial disclosure from the mother’s new partner.

The father listed a couple of reasons why he was pursuing the motion. The first was that while there had been no material change in circumstances since signing, he said he was suffering from depression when he signed the Minutes of Settlement, and signed only because he planned to take his own life. He did not expect to ever be bound by the agreement. He went on to add that the mediator “intimidated and berated” him, resulting to his signing the agreement under duress, and against his lawyer’s advice.

The court’s analysis

The court explained that in order to set aside a domestic contract, the Family Law Act states that a court can set aside a domestic contract in the following scenarios:

(a) if a party failed to disclose to the other significant assets, or significant debts or other liabilities, existing when the domestic contract was made;

(b) if a party did not understand the nature or consequences of the domestic contract; or

(c) otherwise in accordance with the law of contract.

The court found that while the mediator may have warned the father about the potential financial consequences of not agreeing to sign the Minutes of Settlement, it should not have resulted in the father experiencing duress. The father also failed to provide any evidence that he had been suffering from depression, as he claimed to have been.

The court found the husband to have failed to show that the Minutes of Settlement should not be set aside.

This case serves as a good example that separation and divorce should be handled with the assistance of experienced family law lawyers. The team at Gelman & Associates provides our clients with exceptional legal representation in all areas of family law. We help our clients make informed decisions while keeping an eye on what is most important to them and their family. We provide all of our prospective clients with a comprehensive family law kit during their initial consultation as well as our firm’s handbook on separation and divorce. We can be reached online or at (844) 736-0200

Written by Lisa Gelman

Senior Lawyer

Senior Lawyer Lisa Gelman has over 25 years of family law experience and founded Gelman & Associates to provide strategic legal counsel in family law matters concerning divorce, parenting, separation, and more.

Frequently Asked Questions - enforcement & modification orders

A restraining order in the context of family court is an order that prohibits the contact that one party can have with another. Based on the particulars of a given restraining order, it can prohibit direct and/or indirect contact, and require that the party against whom the restraining order has been taken out maintain a certain physical distance from the other party. In the family law context, a restraining order has to be requested by way of a motion brought at the court. The party seeking the order must provide affidavit evidence to substantiate the need for the restraining order. The party against whom the order is sought must likewise have an opportunity to argue his/her case, and to this end judges will usually ask that a motion for a restraining order be brought with notice to the other party.

If you believe that your restraining order is required immediately, you may bring an urgent, ex parte motion for same (ex parte means that the motion is brought without notice to the other party, who is not served with your motion materials and is not given notice that the motion will even be taking place). Because restraining orders can affect possession of the matrimonial home and parenting time, it is imperative that the party against whom the order is sought have the opportunity to make his or her own case. Accordingly, if a judge grants a restraining order brought on an urgent, ex parte motion, the judge will also order that the motion return in one week’s time so that the party against  whom the order has been granted may be  properly served with motions materials and  have an opportunity to defend the action.

Suppose one of the parents does not follow the court’s order. He or she may be called to court and explain why she wasn’t able to uphold the initial agreement. If his or her reason isn’t valid, the court may change the earlier deal, and it may favor the other parent.

Each province and territory in Canada has a maintenance enforcement program for family orders and agreements. Additionally, the federal government may refuse to issue a Canadian passport if the applicant is delinquent in child support payments. They also have the authority to garnish wages for the back payments owed. In the USA, the Office of Child Support Enforcement, which is part of the Administration for Children and Families in the Department of Health and Human Services, is now in charge of the federal child support enforcement program.

Ex parte motions provide an exemption to the principles of due process in emergencies by allowing you to petition the court without having to give notice or serve the other parties in your case. If the judge issues the ex parte order, it’s only for a limited time.

Yes, it is possible to change the initial terms of a separation agreement if you and your spouse agree to the changes and sign a written agreement to change the terms. If your spouse does not agree to change the terms, you can make a court application to change the separation agreement.

No matter what the circumstances surrounding your separation agreement are, our Toronto separation lawyers can help you make changes when you need to.

You can use this motion if you need to change your order. By filing this motion, you’re asking the court to change something in your final order. It would help if you showed that there has been a substantial change in circumstances since the last court order. You can’t file this motion just because you disagree with the order. You shouldn’t also file this motion too soon after the court releases the final order. If things have changed in your children’s lives, you can ask to modify the order based on those changes. Other samples you can change may include but not be limited to:

  • Spousal support
  • Decision-making issues for the children
  • Issues related to parenting time
  • Child support

If you deny court-approved parenting time, it could be a possibility. The court may find you in contempt. You may also have to compensate the other person for any lost parenting time or legal fees they had to pay to enforce the parenting arrangement.

If you get an order and want to change it, you first need to assess your relationship with the opposing party.
If you both agree, you can apply for a consent order and need not go to court. If you do not, you may seek help from mediators or counsellors who can help you talk things out. If you still do not agree after mediation, you will need to apply to the court to change the order.

Related Blogs

Family law is what we do

Read our recent blogs on enforcement & modification orders topics in Ontario.

View all blogs

Locations We Serve

Multiple offices to help serve you better

With numerous offices across Ontario, we make it easier for our clients to have access to our lawyers. Please note that offices marked with an (**) are satellite offices and require a consultation booked in advance. We are not able to accommodate walk-in appointments at these locations. Call us to book a free consultation today.

Still have family law questions?

Speak to a lawyer

If you need legal advice regarding enforcement & modification orders matters in Ontario, contact our Toronto family law lawyers for a free consultation. Some conditions may apply.

Book Your Consult