Family Lawyers Advising on the Matrimonial Home

For most couples, the matrimonial home represents the largest asset they jointly own, and has deep emotional resonance as the place where a marriage began, the place where children have grown up, and the place where memories are collected. Unsurprisingly, the matrimonial home and what becomes of it after a separation or divorce often become a point of contention, even for couples whose separation is otherwise amicable.

At Gelman & Associates, our knowledgeable family lawyers have decades of collective experience advising clients on division of property issues, including proactively and strategically guiding clients on what to do with the matrimonial home. We advocate for the optimal outcome for our clients, and are not afraid to get tough when needed.

How is the Matrimonial Home defined?

Section 18(1) of the Family Law Act defines a matrimonial home as any property in which either spouse has an interest and which is currently, or was at the time of separation, “ordinarily occupied by the person and his or her spouse as their family residence.”

Under the definition of “matrimonial home” in the Family Law Act, more than one home can be considered the matrimonial home, provided it was regularly being used by both spouses at the time of separation.  For example, if both spouses spent every weekend at the cottage together, it could be considered the matrimonial home.  Conversely, if the couple owned a condo that was almost exclusively used by one spouse only, it would likely not be considered part of the matrimonial home.

Can my spouse “kick me out” (or vice versa)?

Everyone has heard the horror stories about a spouse coming home one day to find all their things on the front lawn and the locks on the doors changed.  This is not an approach any separating couple should contemplate, nor is it a legally reasonable or permissible approach for a spouse to take.  Barring a court order or agreement between the parties, both parties have a right to equal possession of the matrimonial home; even if the home is only in one spouse’s name.

How does the Matrimonial Home affect custody issues?

If there is an anticipated custody battle, a spouse should think twice before leaving the matrimonial home.  When considering custody, the courts will always act in the best interest of the child.  In many cases, it will be considered least disruptive (and therefore most beneficial) for children to remain in the matrimonial home.  In such cases, leaving the home may weaken the argument for custody of the children.  Unless a separation agreement is in place and custody issues have been settled, it is advisable to remain in the matrimonial home if custody of your children is desired.

Experienced Divorce Lawyers Representing Clients with Contentious Matrimonial Home Issues in Aurora, Barrie, Downtown Toronto, Mississauga, North York and Scarborough.

In addition to being a significant asset, the matrimonial home is usually associated with deep emotional ties.  At Gelman & Associates, we will provide compassionate, forward-thinking guidance to our clients while aggressively pursuing their legal interests. Call us at (416) 736-0200 or 1-844-736-0200 or contact us online.

From the Blog

Latest posts from the Gelman & Associates blog

12

Must Canadian Children Be Registered as a Specific Sex on Official Documents?

Earlier this year, an eight-month-old baby in British Columbia made international news when the child was issued a health card that does not specify a sex. The document is widely believed to be a first, both in Canada and worldwide. A Health Card with No Specified Sex The child’s parent, Kori Doty, a non-binary transgender …


Read More
05

Court of Appeal Upholds Cohabitation Agreement Waiving Spousal Support

The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld a cohabitation agreement that a woman signed decades ago without obtaining independent legal advice, finding no reason to overturn the agreement. What Happened? The parties in question began to live together in 1997. The husband had previously had an acrimonious separation and wanted to avoid a similar situation …


Read More
27

HRTO: Barring Child of Same Sex Couple from Attending Religious School was not Breach of Human Rights

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) recently found that a Christian Evangelical school that refused to admit the adopted son of a same-sex married couple did not breach the Ontario Human Rights Code. What Happened? A married lesbian couple wanted to enroll their adopted child in a privately owned and operated Christian school. Both …


Read More

Contact

Questions? Send us an email

Contact Form - Home
Sending