Family Lawyers Advising on the Matrimonial Home

For most couples, the matrimonial home represents the largest asset they jointly own, and has deep emotional resonance as the place where a marriage began, the place where children have grown up, and the place where memories are collected. Unsurprisingly, the matrimonial home and what becomes of it after a separation or divorce often become a point of contention, even for couples whose separation is otherwise amicable.

At Gelman & Associates, our knowledgeable family lawyers have decades of collective experience advising clients on division of property issues, including proactively and strategically guiding clients on what to do with the matrimonial home. We advocate for the optimal outcome for our clients, and are not afraid to get tough when needed.

How is the Matrimonial Home defined?

Section 18(1) of the Family Law Act defines a matrimonial home as any property in which either spouse has an interest and which is currently, or was at the time of separation, “ordinarily occupied by the person and his or her spouse as their family residence.”

Under the definition of “matrimonial home” in the Family Law Act, more than one home can be considered the matrimonial home, provided it was regularly being used by both spouses at the time of separation.  For example, if both spouses spent every weekend at the cottage together, it could be considered the matrimonial home.  Conversely, if the couple owned a condo that was almost exclusively used by one spouse only, it would likely not be considered part of the matrimonial home.

Can my spouse “kick me out” (or vice versa)?

Everyone has heard the horror stories about a spouse coming home one day to find all their things on the front lawn and the locks on the doors changed.  This is not an approach any separating couple should contemplate, nor is it a legally reasonable or permissible approach for a spouse to take.  Barring a court order or agreement between the parties, both parties have a right to equal possession of the matrimonial home; even if the home is only in one spouse’s name.

How does the Matrimonial Home affect custody issues?

If there is an anticipated custody battle, a spouse should think twice before leaving the matrimonial home.  When considering custody, the courts will always act in the best interest of the child.  In many cases, it will be considered least disruptive (and therefore most beneficial) for children to remain in the matrimonial home.  In such cases, leaving the home may weaken the argument for custody of the children.  Unless a separation agreement is in place and custody issues have been settled, it is advisable to remain in the matrimonial home if custody of your children is desired.

Experienced Divorce Lawyers Representing Clients with Contentious Matrimonial Home Issues in Aurora, Barrie, Downtown Toronto, Mississauga, North York and Scarborough.

In addition to being a significant asset, the matrimonial home is usually associated with deep emotional ties.  At Gelman & Associates, we will provide compassionate, forward-thinking guidance to our clients while aggressively pursuing their legal interests. Call us at (416) 736-0200 or 1-844-736-0200 or contact us online.

From the Blog

Latest posts from the Gelman & Associates blog

11

Wealthy Husband Ordered to Pay Wife Spousal Support of $30,000 per Month

In a recent case, an Ontario court considered the interesting question of how much spousal support should be awarded to a wife whose husband earned approximately $2,090,000 per year. The Parties’ Story The parties began to cohabit in December 2001, married in June 2006 and separated in May 2017. While the husband was a very …


Read More
05

When Will Courts Consider Forgiving Arrears For A Parent Or Spouse?

Child support and spousal support obligations are serious, and failing to pay them could leave a parent in arrears, and a large debt to repay.  Only in certain situations will courts retroactively discharge or rescind support arrears. A recent case from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice serves as a good summary of which types …


Read More
28

Court Finds Mother in Contempt

Court orders cannot be ignored or disobeyed, and complying with a court order is not optional. In a recent case, an Ontario court considered whether or not the mother of a young child was in contempt for refusing to grant access to the child’s paternal grandmother in accordance with a previous order. What Happened? The …


Read More

Contact

Questions? Send us an email

Contact Form - Home
Sending