Family Lawyers Advising on the Matrimonial Home

For most couples, the matrimonial home represents the largest asset they jointly own, and has deep emotional resonance as the place where a marriage began, the place where children have grown up, and the place where memories are collected. Unsurprisingly, the matrimonial home and what becomes of it after a separation or divorce often become a point of contention, even for couples whose separation is otherwise amicable.

At Gelman & Associates, our knowledgeable family lawyers have decades of collective experience advising clients on division of property issues, including proactively and strategically guiding clients on what to do with the matrimonial home. We advocate for the optimal outcome for our clients, and are not afraid to get tough when needed.

How is the Matrimonial Home defined?

Section 18(1) of the Family Law Act defines a matrimonial home as any property in which either spouse has an interest and which is currently, or was at the time of separation, “ordinarily occupied by the person and his or her spouse as their family residence.”

Under the definition of “matrimonial home” in the Family Law Act, more than one home can be considered the matrimonial home, provided it was regularly being used by both spouses at the time of separation.  For example, if both spouses spent every weekend at the cottage together, it could be considered the matrimonial home.  Conversely, if the couple owned a condo that was almost exclusively used by one spouse only, it would likely not be considered part of the matrimonial home.

Can my spouse “kick me out” (or vice versa)?

Everyone has heard the horror stories about a spouse coming home one day to find all their things on the front lawn and the locks on the doors changed.  This is not an approach any separating couple should contemplate, nor is it a legally reasonable or permissible approach for a spouse to take.  Barring a court order or agreement between the parties, both parties have a right to equal possession of the matrimonial home; even if the home is only in one spouse’s name.

How does the Matrimonial Home affect custody issues?

If there is an anticipated custody battle, a spouse should think twice before leaving the matrimonial home.  When considering custody, the courts will always act in the best interest of the child.  In many cases, it will be considered least disruptive (and therefore most beneficial) for children to remain in the matrimonial home.  In such cases, leaving the home may weaken the argument for custody of the children.  Unless a separation agreement is in place and custody issues have been settled, it is advisable to remain in the matrimonial home if custody of your children is desired.

Experienced Divorce Lawyers Representing Clients with Contentious Matrimonial Home Issues in Aurora, Barrie, Downtown Toronto, Mississauga, North York and Scarborough.

In addition to being a significant asset, the matrimonial home is usually associated with deep emotional ties.  At Gelman & Associates, we will provide compassionate, forward-thinking guidance to our clients while aggressively pursuing their legal interests. Call us at (416) 736-0200 or 1-844-736-0200 or contact us online.

From the Blog

Latest posts from the Gelman & Associates blog

13

The Importance of Obtaining Independent Legal Advice in a Family Law Dispute

A recent Ontario decision highlights the importance of obtaining independent legal advice prior to signing any legal documents in a family law dispute. Failure to do so can have a significant impact on your legal rights and on your finances post-separation or divorce. What Happened? The parties separated in 2005, after eight years of marriage, …


Read More
04

Involving the Office of the Children’s Lawyer: Custody and Access and the Best Interests of the Child

An Ontario court recently considered a situation where the parties’ custody and access proceedings were adjourned so that the Office of the Children’s Lawyer (OCL) could become involved and potentially conduct an investigation under section 112 of the Courts of Justice Act (CJA). What happened? The parties were married in July 2013 and separated in …


Read More
28

Non-Parental Access to a Child: What Will Court’s Consider?

An Ontario court recently examined a request by a non-parent for access to a child, and found that it would not be in the child’s best interests to have continued contact with his mother’s ex-boyfriend (who was not his biological father). What Happened? The man in question (the Applicant) was not the biological father of …


Read More

Contact

Questions? Send us an email

Contact Form - Home
Sending