We are open in our 8 offices to serve your needs

Justice Sloan of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently observed that,

Deciding the custody and access of children is part science and part art.

In Henderson v. Cayuga, Justice Sloan was asked to rule on a motion with respect to the residency schedule of a 4-year-old girl, Sophie.   Sophie’s father expressed serious concerns about Sophie not receiving proper care while in the custody of her mother.  Sophie was residing with her mother Sunday, Monday and Thursday nights, and alternate Friday and Saturday nights.  She was residing with her father on Tuesday and Wednesday nights, and alternate Friday and Saturday nights. Troubling Allegations The father’s allegations about the mother and her living situation included the following:

  • the mother worked shifts from 2:30 p.m. to 11:20 p.m., and Sophie therefore had to sleep at different places with different relatives depending on the night;
  • an affidavit from the mother’s former superintendent revealed that the superintendent had received numerous complaints from other tenants about the mother’s inconsiderate and neglectful behaviour, excessive noise, damage to property, and unsanitary outdoor area;  the mother was issued an eviction notice;
  • the mother was set to move in February 2017 pursuant to the eviction notice but no one knew where she would re-locate;
  • the mother was unable to control her anger, used cocaine and marijuana, and exposed the child to unhealthy behaviour;
  • the mother allowed Sophie’s health card to expire and failed to take her to the hospital when it was required;
  • bedbugs were found at the mother’s residence; and
  • severe and frequent rashes on Sophie’s bottom.

The mother provided the Court with a letter from her employer which described her as a “phenomenal” employee, with no issues of concern.  The mother also denied the drug use and stated that she would change to the graveyard shift at work so that she could put Sophie to bed at night. Little to Calm the Court’s Fears The Court stated that the letter from the mother’s employer did “…little to calm the fears of the court with respect to the residence of Sophie”.  The Court was clearly very concerned about the numerous housekeeping issues at the mother’s home, including garbage strewn about and bedbugs (although they had been brought under control).  Further, it was unexplained and disconcerting that Sophie’s health care had been allowed to expire and that the mother was looking for a new residence. The Court contrasted the living situation at the father’s residence, where the father had a stable home and work schedule that allowed him to be home in the late afternoons and evenings. In Sophie’s Best Interests Deciding custody and access issues may be part science and part art, but the decision is always rooted in the determination of the best interests of the child.  In this case, the Court was convinced that it was in the best interests of Sophie to spend more sleeping time at her father’s residence.  Justice Sloan changed the parties’ original access order so that Sophie would reside at her father’s home except for alternate weekends after day care, and each Wednesday from after day care until 7:30 p.m.  The Court’s order also gave the parties the freedom to increase the mother’s access by agreement. If you have questions about custody and access or any other family law issue, contact the experienced lawyers at Gelman & Associates at (416) 736-0200 or 1-844-742-0200 or contact us online for a confidential initial consultation.

Contact Form - Contact Us Page

Request a free consultation

Please fill out this form with your contact information and someone will be in touch with you soon.

Contact Preferences

How would you like to be contacted? Click all that apply.

How can we help you?

Brief description of your legal issue:

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm is not secure and does not establish a lawyer-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.



4211 Yonge Street • Suite #210 • Toronto • Ontario • M2P 2A9

View Map | Learn More

Aurora **

16 Industrial Parkway South • Aurora • Ontario • L4G 0R4

View Map | Learn More


500 Mapleton Avenue, Suite A • Barrie, Ontario • L4N 9C2

View Map | Learn More

Downtown Toronto **

100 King Street West • Suite #5600 • Toronto • Ontario • M5X 1C9

View Map | Learn More


4257 Sherwoodtowne Blvd Suite #300 • Mississauga Ontario • L4Z 1Y5

View Map | Learn More

Scarborough **

10 Milner Business Court • 3rd Floor • Scarborough • Ontario • M1B 3M6

View Map | Learn More

Grimsby **

33 Main Street West, • Grimsby • Ontario • L3M 1R3

View Map | Learn More

Whitby **

105 Consumers Drive - Unit 2, • Whitby • Ontario • L1N 1C4

View Map | Learn More
** Satellite office that requires you to book an appointment with us prior to arriving at the office.
Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers
Law Society of Ontario
Peel Law Association
UJA Federation of Greater Toronto
York Region Law Association
Collaborative Practice Simcoe County
Law Association Simcoe County
Widows & Orphans Fund