Gelman Family Law Lawyers

Over 200+ 5-Star Google Reviews

Book Consult

Mother Accuses Employer Of Violating Human Rights In Not Accommodating Daycare Needs

Published: February 6, 2019

Book Consult1-844-736-0200

Table of Contents

Mother Accuses Employer Of Violating Human Rights In Not Accommodating Daycare Needs

Childcare is an expensive, and it’s something many Canadian families struggle with, both in terms of affordability and availability. What is not often discussed is the challenges faced by parents who are unable to find daycare for their children.  A recent case from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice looked at whether a parent was discriminated against by her employer for lacking child-care.

The background

The employee began working for the employer in May 2010. Her last day was on December 13, 2013, which was the day she started maternity leave prior to the birth of her third child. Her statutory entitlement to maternity leave was 12 months, though through text messages she arranged to plan her return for January 2015. The employer sent the employee a written offer of employment on January 6, 2015, noting the work day started at 8:30am. This was not included in her previous contract.

Prior to her maternity leave the employer had occasionally spoken to the employee about her arrival time. She was not able to arrive at work before 8:30 due to her family responsibilities at home. However, she was given a cell phone and managed to have meetings from home on occasion. The employee claimed she had been given permission to arrive at work any time before 10:00am, though this was disputed by the employer. The employee also managed to arrive at work early for meetings 143 times between August 2011 and November 1, 2013. The employee had never been disciplined for occasions when she arrived at work after 8:30am.

When the employee met with the employer on January 6 ,2015, she was informed there had been changes to the employer’s operations, requiring her to be at work at 8:30am each day. However, the employee’s mother, who had previously lived with her, had moved out, meaning she had been planning to be in the office from 10:00-5:00 while her older children were in school, and available by phone otherwise. Nevertheless she told the employer she would try to find childcare for her older children before they went to school. She was put on a waiting list at her children’s school and expected to have to wait six months before an opening came up.

Ultimately the employee testified she did not return to work, having been unable to secure before school care for her two children, and the employer would not allow her to arrive at 10:00am.

The employee’s claim

The employee claimed the employer breached its obligations under the Employment Standards Act, 2000, particularly in that the hours offered to her on her return to work represented a unilateral change to a fundamental term of the employment contract. She also claimed the employer had an obligation to accommodate her childcare needs as required under the provinces Human Rights Code.

The employer’s perspective

The court spent some time covering instances that happened at work before the employee took leave that brought her credibility into question. This was further emphasized when the employer testified it had offered the employee an alternative position, which would have allowed her to start work at 10:00am. The employee did not respond to this offer. The court summarized its analysis, stating,

“Taken as a whole, the evidence leads me to conclude that (the employer) was a good employer to the (employee). (The employer) allowed the (employee) flexibility with her hours, and showed her sympathy and accommodation following earlier miscarriages and throughout her last pregnancy. In return, (the employer) expected and understood that the (employee) would be able to come to work in the early morning when required, and be willing and able to field early morning telephone calls from home or en route to work.”

The court also found the employees lack of communication with the employer, including her decision to simply not return to work, left the employer with too little information to properly accommodate her.

The experienced family law lawyers at Gelman & Associates understand the pressures faced by working parents, and the impact that competing needs and obligations can have on a family. We can help protect your rights and assets during a separationdivorce or any other family law matter. O phone lines are open Monday to Friday from 8 AM to 8 PM. We can be reached at (844) 736-0200 as well as online for a confidential initial consultation.

Written by Lisa Gelman

Senior Lawyer

Senior Lawyer Lisa Gelman has over 25 years of family law experience and founded Gelman & Associates to provide strategic legal counsel in family law matters concerning divorce, parenting, separation, and more.

Frequently Asked Questions - enforcement & modification orders

A restraining order in the context of family court is an order that prohibits the contact that one party can have with another. Based on the particulars of a given restraining order, it can prohibit direct and/or indirect contact, and require that the party against whom the restraining order has been taken out maintain a certain physical distance from the other party. In the family law context, a restraining order has to be requested by way of a motion brought at the court. The party seeking the order must provide affidavit evidence to substantiate the need for the restraining order. The party against whom the order is sought must likewise have an opportunity to argue his/her case, and to this end judges will usually ask that a motion for a restraining order be brought with notice to the other party.

If you believe that your restraining order is required immediately, you may bring an urgent, ex parte motion for same (ex parte means that the motion is brought without notice to the other party, who is not served with your motion materials and is not given notice that the motion will even be taking place). Because restraining orders can affect possession of the matrimonial home and parenting time, it is imperative that the party against whom the order is sought have the opportunity to make his or her own case. Accordingly, if a judge grants a restraining order brought on an urgent, ex parte motion, the judge will also order that the motion return in one week’s time so that the party against  whom the order has been granted may be  properly served with motions materials and  have an opportunity to defend the action.

Suppose one of the parents does not follow the court’s order. He or she may be called to court and explain why she wasn’t able to uphold the initial agreement. If his or her reason isn’t valid, the court may change the earlier deal, and it may favor the other parent.

Each province and territory in Canada has a maintenance enforcement program for family orders and agreements. Additionally, the federal government may refuse to issue a Canadian passport if the applicant is delinquent in child support payments. They also have the authority to garnish wages for the back payments owed. In the USA, the Office of Child Support Enforcement, which is part of the Administration for Children and Families in the Department of Health and Human Services, is now in charge of the federal child support enforcement program.

Ex parte motions provide an exemption to the principles of due process in emergencies by allowing you to petition the court without having to give notice or serve the other parties in your case. If the judge issues the ex parte order, it’s only for a limited time.

Yes, it is possible to change the initial terms of a separation agreement if you and your spouse agree to the changes and sign a written agreement to change the terms. If your spouse does not agree to change the terms, you can make a court application to change the separation agreement.

No matter what the circumstances surrounding your separation agreement are, our Toronto separation lawyers can help you make changes when you need to.

You can use this motion if you need to change your order. By filing this motion, you’re asking the court to change something in your final order. It would help if you showed that there has been a substantial change in circumstances since the last court order. You can’t file this motion just because you disagree with the order. You shouldn’t also file this motion too soon after the court releases the final order. If things have changed in your children’s lives, you can ask to modify the order based on those changes. Other samples you can change may include but not be limited to:

  • Spousal support
  • Decision-making issues for the children
  • Issues related to parenting time
  • Child support

If you deny court-approved parenting time, it could be a possibility. The court may find you in contempt. You may also have to compensate the other person for any lost parenting time or legal fees they had to pay to enforce the parenting arrangement.

If you get an order and want to change it, you first need to assess your relationship with the opposing party.
If you both agree, you can apply for a consent order and need not go to court. If you do not, you may seek help from mediators or counsellors who can help you talk things out. If you still do not agree after mediation, you will need to apply to the court to change the order.

Related Blogs

Family law is what we do

Read our recent blogs on enforcement & modification orders topics in Ontario.

View all blogs

Locations We Serve

Multiple offices to help serve you better

With numerous offices across Ontario, we make it easier for our clients to have access to our lawyers. Please note that offices marked with an (**) are satellite offices and require a consultation booked in advance. We are not able to accommodate walk-in appointments at these locations. Call us to book a free consultation today.

Still have family law questions?

Speak to a lawyer

If you need legal advice regarding enforcement & modification orders matters in Ontario, contact our Toronto family law lawyers for a free consultation. Some conditions may apply.

Book Your Consult