Gelman Family Law Lawyers

Over 200+ 5-Star Google Reviews

Book Consult

Moving When Separated or Divorced and the Effect on Children and Parenting Time

Published: December 18, 2023

Book Consult1-844-736-0200
Moving When Separated or Divorced and the Effect on Children and Parenting Time

Many parents do not realize that the community that your child(ren) are born into and are raised to be a part of, whether geographical or social, can play a significant role in parenting issues upon the separation and/or divorce of parties, particularly when one party makes the decision to move with the children in tow. 

Under section 22(2) of the Children’s Law Reform Act, a child’s “habitual residence” is the place where they have most recently resided either with both parents, or if the parents are living separate and apart, with one parent under an agreement or Order, or with that parent on a permanent basis for a significant period of time. This refers not only to the parent that the child resides with, but the community where they reside. If you are questioning where your child’s habitual residence is beyond the parent that they primarily reside with, you can ask yourself certain questions to determine this, such as where the child attends school, extra-curriculars, attends community programming, have relationships with friends, family, and other community members, etc. 

If a parent is separated and is planning to move with the child(ren) coming with them, they must consider section 39.1 of the Children’s Law Reform Act, as below; 

39.1 (1) A person who has decision-making responsibility or parenting time with respect to a child and who intends to make a change in residence, or in the child’s residence, shall notify any other person who has decision-making responsibility, parenting time, or contact under a contact order with respect to the child of the intention. 

39.1 (2) The notice shall be in writing and shall set out, 

  1. The date on which the change is expected to occur; and 
  1. The address of the new residence and contact information of the person or child, as the case may be. 

As such, if a parent is planning a move, they must notify the other parent of their intention to do so. There is document called a “Notice of Intention to Relocate” that can be completed and provided to the other parent, who will then have 30 days to complete and provide to the other party either their consent to the move in question or a responding form, being an “Objection to Notice of Intention to Relocate”. The parent who is attempting to relocate should include in their Notice not only the information outlined in the Children’s Law Reform Act section above but information about the plan that they have for the child upon moving. This can include why they believe this is in the best interests of the child, reasons for moving, resources and community supports that would be available, options and arrangements that have been made for services such as enrolling the child(ren) in school, finding them a doctor, dentist, etc. This information can assist the other parent in understanding the plan for the child as effectively as possible and, hopefully, make it easier for them to consent to the change if it is in the best interests of the child(ren).

Should the suggested move not be in agreement with the other party, as they do not believe it to be in the best interests of the child, they would advise as to the reasons for such in their responding Objection to the Notice for Relocation. 

Should the parents find themselves in a stalemate with respect to these materials and be unable to consent to a plan for the child(ren) on their own, their only choice moving forward to follow the proper legal protocols is to bring a Motion to the Family Court and request a decision from a Judge. Should a party make the decision to do so, both parties will have the opportunity to submit materials and attend a Motion date where they will reiterate and explain their perspectives on the issue so that a Judge will make a decision. It is imperative to remember through this process that no one known your own family better than you and your co-parent, and putting a significant decision of this nature into the hands of a Judge, who is a stranger to you and your child, is not always the best option. However, if there is an impasse, it is often necessary. 

The onus is generally on the moving party to prove to a Judge that the child(ren) will not only have an equal, but improved quality of life as a result of the proposed move, or that it is necessary. It is important to have a plan for the child to continue to have contact with the other parent if that was the case before now, as well as family and friends. The ultimate consideration in these kinds of proceedings is generally the best interests of the child; the Judge will likely make a decision based on what is best for the kids, not based on the rights of the parents. In making this decision, the Judge will consider what steps have been taken by the parties to make arrangements for the child(ren), their relationship to their current community and “habitual residence” and why the move is requested/necessary. Ultimately, on a Motion, the Judge will make a decision and issue an Order based on that decision which the parties will ultimately be required to follow, whether they agree with the decision or not. 

There are circumstances where parents are not aware of the requirements laid out herein and make the decision to move with the child(ren) without providing the requisite notice or getting consent from the other party or an Order from the Family Law Courts. In these situations, it is very common that the non-moving parent will bring an Urgent Motion to the Family Court and request an Order that the children be returned to their habitual residence immediately. Though there is no guarantee of the Order that would be made, in those circumstances unless there is compelling evidence from the moving party as to why they did so without following the proper protocols, it is very likely that the other parent would be successful and the moving parent risks losing care of their child(ren) to a degree or altogether. As such, it is imperative that these steps be followed, though they can be long and tedious, to avoid a negative result.

Written by Lisa Gelman

Senior Lawyer

Senior Lawyer Lisa Gelman has over 25 years of family law experience and founded Gelman & Associates to provide strategic legal counsel in family law matters concerning divorce, parenting, separation, and more.

Frequently Asked Questions - child custody & access

It is not uncommon for someone to want to relocate after a divorce. If you still live in the marital residence, the familiar surroundings and memories may be too much for your heart to handle. Or in the process of reinventing yourself post-divorce you may want to take a new job, move closer to your friends and family, or simply wish to start fresh somewhere new. There are many reasons a person may want to move after going through a divorce, however if you have children you will need to think twice before making a big move.

Emotionally, it can be challenging for a child to move to an unfamiliar place. Often, they are most at ease in a familiar environment with access to family and friends. Changing schools, living in a new city or even a new house can be difficult on a child, especially after dealing with the emotional turmoil associated with divorce.

Legally, there are certain implications to relocating away from the current jurisdiction where the children ordinarily reside. Before moving you and the noncustodial parent can negotiate with the absence of a lawyer, a written agreement about the moce and any changes to visitation that may be needed. If you cannot reach an agreement about the move, you then must file an Application/Motion to the court to hear your matter and for a judge to make a decision before you move. Usually the court requires at least 30 days notice to the other parent of your court Application/Motion. It may take longer to reach an agreement with the other parent or get a court order. It is a good idea to give notice of 90 days before the move, as as soon as possible and to consult with a lawyer first. Upon receiving this notice, they can challenge your proposed change of residence or apply for a variation to the existing custody or access orders.

The leading case that sets out the legal test in determining mobility is Gordon vs. Goertz (1996) 2. S.C.R. 27

Similar to any other action involving variation of an existing custody order, the person challenging the relocation has to show that the move will result in a material change in circumstances affecting the child. Once this has been established, a judge will determine the best interests of the child in light of the relevant circumstances. These relevant circumstances include the existing custody and access relationship, the relationship between the child and the custodial parent, the views of the child, and the reason for the proposed change of residence among other circumstances. As with every other custody proceeding, the judges determination will turn on the best interests of the child. The judge’s inquiry is individualized and will involve all factors relevant to the case at hand.

Because mobility has become so easy in today’s society, often separation agreements or custody orders will address relocation and place specific restrictions on changing residences. Non-removal clauses that ban the extra-provincial removal of children without consent of the noncustodial parent. In these cases, the custodial parent who wishes to relocate will have to initiate the action by placing an application with the court.

If you are contemplating a move, you must consider the emotional needs of your child, as well as your former spouse’s right to challenge your relocation. Typically, courts only allow a custodial parent to relocate if the proposed move is in good faith and not intended to frustrate the noncustodial parent’s relationship with the child. Additionally, if a custodial parent relocates, they must be willing to accommodate the noncustodial parent’s access to the child; sometimes this means that the relocating parent will have to pay the additional costs of access.

In sum, if you are a custodial parent, moving isn’t as easy as just loading up the car and hitting the road – but it is still possible.

Yes, but they will need to establish paternity, especially if the father and the mother separate. Here are the ways to establish paternity as recognized by the court:

  • Act of birth
  • Presumption of paternity
  • Uninterrupted possession of status
  • Voluntary declaration

No. Even when the parents are unmarried, divorced, or separated, one parent cannot keep the child from seeing the other unless the court deems it appropriate to the child’s best interests.

Historically, mothers have been more likely to get sole custody of their child in both consent and contested orders, as they are usually the child’s primary caregiver. However, as more mothers also work outside the home, courts could also rule in favor of the father.

The majority of judges strive to make decisions that are in your children’s best interest. Giving full custody to one parent is usually the best option, except in cases with concerns such as child or substance abuse. This typically means keeping in contact with and maintaining relationships with both parents.
You should do everything possible to prepare for the subsequent child custody negotiations, whether you’re a parent seeking full custody or shared custody:
Be honest with yourself about your ability to manage things alone, in terms of practicality, finances, and other factors. You may get the result you want by presenting the strongest case for custody by doing the following:

  • Make a Strategy: If custody is granted, a court will expect you to be ready. Compile thoughtful replies to hypothetical queries posed in court.
  • Speak with people who have gone through the child custody procedure before you. They may provide you advice and tell you what to anticipate.
  • Judges look for proof of a meaningful relationship in addition to making sure you can provide a child’s practical and basic needs. Simply put, be involved in your children’s lives.
  • Continue to pay child support regularly, whether you’re asking the court for full or shared custody. When you start the procedure, you’ll want to make sure you have a strong track record.
  • Keep a detailed log of your visitation schedule. This is a crucial aspect of obtaining child custody. Visitation records reflect how often you see your children under the present arrangements and your dependability, as well as dedication to them.
  • During all child custody hearings, the court will inquire about acceptable living accommodations. Even if you live in a tiny apartment, you should create a unique and secure environment for your child.
  • Courts may determine child custody in part by how you treat your child’s other parent. Being hostile or unpleasant to the other parent makes collaborative decision-making more complicated and can break apart parent-child ties. As a result, judges are more inclined to favor the parent who isn’t behaving badly.
  • While parents typically spend a lot of time thinking about what they believe is best for their children, children’s perspectives are sometimes overlooked. The court will be interested in learning what the children desire and will most likely question them directly at some point throughout the proceedings. You can better inform your decision-making by asking your child what they think.

No. Parenting time and child support are different from each other. While it is a child’s right to be provided with financial support, it is also their right to spend time with their parents. Thus, even if the child support was cancelled the parent formerly supporting can still enjoy parenting time with the child.

“There is no fixed age for when a child can say which parent they want to live with after a divorce. However, by law, a child must be 16 years old to decide on this matter. The exception to this is when there is a court order stating that a child/ren must live with one parent until they turn 17 or 18.

Under certain circumstances, it is possible to legally prevent your child/ren’s father from seeing or contacting them. It may be necessary if he presents a potential danger to your child/ren. If you were never married to the father of your child and there is no court order saying otherwise, you can do anything you want until paternity is confirmed.

Locations We Serve

Multiple offices to help serve you better

With numerous offices across Ontario, we make it easier for our clients to have access to our lawyers. Please note that offices marked with an (**) are satellite offices and require a consultation booked in advance. We are not able to accommodate walk-in appointments at these locations. Call us to book a free consultation today.

Still have family law questions?

Speak to a lawyer

If you need legal advice regarding child custody & access matters in Ontario, contact our Toronto family law lawyers for a free consultation. Some conditions may apply.

Book Your Consult