Opens in a new tab
Gelman Family Law Lawyers

Over 200+ 5-Star Google Reviews

Book Consult

Contempt of Court for Breaching Access Orders

Published: January 15, 2020

Last Updated: March 23, 2026

Book Consult1-844-736-0200

Table of Contents

Contempt of Court for Breaching Access Orders

In a recent case, an Ontario court heard a father’s motions to find the mother in contempt of court for failing to facilitate access in accordance with court orders. In considering the motions, the court had to consider the interesting question of when, and in what circumstances, it would be appropriate to find a party in contempt in the context of a family law proceeding.

The Background

The parties had two children, born in 2002 and 2008.

In 2013, a final order was made. Among other things, the order granted the mother custody of the children and outlined a schedule for access for the father.

In April 2018, the father brought a motion seeking a finding that the mother was in contempt of the final order with respect to the terms of access.

The next month, the contempt motion was adjourned and a temporary order was made for specified access.

In November 2018, the father brought another contempt motion, claiming that the mother had breached both the final and temporary orders.

The Legal Principles With Respect to Contempt in Family Law Proceedings

A three-part test must be satisfied before a court can make a finding of contempt. That is:

  • the order that was breached must state clearly and unequivocally what should and should not be done;
  • the party who disobeys the order must do so deliberately and wilfully; and
  • the evidence must show contempt beyond a reasonable doubt – any doubt must clearly be resolved in favour of the person or entity alleged to have breached the order.

Case law also indicates that contempt is a remedy of last resort. Great caution has to be exercised when considering contempt motions in the context of a family law proceeding.

The Court’s Decision

In granting the father’s motions, the court found that both the final and temporary orders were clear as to the terms of access.

The court also found that the mother was in contempt for the period between October 2017 and April 2018. Specifically, it was during those months that the mother began making unfounded allegations that the children were unsafe in the father’s care and tried to alienate the children from him. In the court’s view, the mother’s behaviour was wilful and deliberate, and her actions met the requirement of “beyond a reasonable doubt,” which supported a contempt finding. The court noted:

… the evidence is clear that [the mother] allowed her belief that [the father] was not an appropriate parent who deserved a relationship with his children to interfere with her obligation as a custodial parent to encourage [the children’s] relationship with their father.

Furthermore, by the fall of 2018, the mother:

  • had permitted the children to choose whether they wished to visit with their father;
  • did not question why the children did not wish to see their father and merely accepted that they feared to be in his care;
  • allowed the children to express their opposition to visits with their father to persons in authority, such as the police;
  • allowed the children to learn that if they expressed their view not to attend visits to persons in authority, including their mother and/or the police, the likely result would be that they would not be required to attend; and
  • had told the children that she supported their belief that they were not safe in the care of the father.

The court found that, sadly, the mother had permitted the children to conclude and maintain the belief that it was no longer acceptable for them to have a relationship with their father.

The court therefore ordered a gradual schedule of access between the younger child and the father. The court stipulated that if the child did not go to these visits, a financial penalty would be imposed on the mother.

Lessons Learned

While it is a rare remedy in family law proceedings, one party may be found in contempt of court if they breach court orders. If you have questions about your rights, it is best to speak with a lawyer. At Gelman & Associates, our lawyers provide exceptional legal representation in all family law matters. Our goal is to always empower clients to make informed decisions about their future. We give all prospective clients a comprehensive family law kit during their initial consultation, as well as a copy of our firm’s handbook on separation and divorce. This information is full of resources that will help you understand and navigate the difficult and often complicated separation and divorce process.

With six offices throughout Aurora, Barrie, Downtown Toronto, Mississauga, North York and Scarborough, we are easily accessible by transit and off-highway. Our phone lines are open Monday to Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Call us at (844) 736-0200, or contact us online to schedule an initial consultation.

 

Written by Lisa Gelman

Senior Lawyer

Senior Lawyer Lisa Gelman has over 25 years of family law experience and founded Gelman & Associates to provide strategic legal counsel in family law matters concerning divorce, parenting, separation, and more.

Frequently Asked Questions - child custody & access

Ontario law does not specify the age at which a child can decide which parent to live with. At most, the Court may consider the preference of the child but that does not necessarily mean that the Court will act favorably on it. The court will consider the child’s maturity, ability to articulate their desires, and the reasoning behind their views when seeking their opinion.

If a parenting plan is included in your court order under the Divorce Act, the document will be legally binding.

In order to change your child’s last name, you will have to be the child’s parent with legal custody or be the legal guardian of the child. In order to change the child’s last name, you will have to provide notice to anyone who has legal access to the child, and that may include your ex-spouse.

In most cases, the answer is no. However, there can be some exceptions that the mother can build a case upon. These include the father putting the child at risk, non-compliance with the court order, or a history of violence by the father.

Creating a custody plan with a narcissistic ex-partner is a task best left to legal professionals. While there might not be one way to deal with a narcissistic ex, there are things that you can do to turn the tables on a narcissistic co-parent. The best way to prevent problems is to go with no contact or limited contact with your ex-partner and put everything in writing if you must only communicate via email or text message to record statements and harassment.

Let us consider that the “moving away” is relocation and not just a change in residency.

Then, let us qualify that the mother will take your child with her.

If the mother is the primary caregiver of the child, you may oppose the relocation by applying the principles laid down under the Gordon vs. Goertz case. You must present your case strongly as to why potentially cutting your child’s relationship as the primary caregiver is to your child’s best interest. This situation falls under the purview of Section 16.93(2) of the Divorce Act.

If both you and the mother have equal parenting time over your child, the mother of the child has the burden of proof as to why the relocation is for the best interest of your child. This situation falls under the purview of Section 16.93(1) of the Divorce Act.

If there is no Court ordered, approved, or awarded parenting time or separation agreement, as contemplated under Section 16.93(3) of the Divorce Act, the mother has the burden of proof to show that relocation is in the best interest of your child.

Note that even if the burden of proof is not laid upon you, it still recommended that you present a strong opposition to the relocation.

Yes, it is possible for your ex to prevent you from relocating with a child you share, although this will likely plan on your parenting arrangements and decision-making responsibility. If you cannot agree about a relocation, a court will decide based on the child’s best interests.

Generally, you need to provide your ex with 60 days’ written notice of your relocation plan, and you must obtain consent or a court order to move the child. A lawyer can help you navigate this process. Our divorce lawyers will guide you through the application and court order process.

Yes, but they will need to establish paternity, especially if the father and the mother separate. Here are the ways to establish paternity as recognized by the court:

  • Act of birth
  • Presumption of paternity
  • Uninterrupted possession of status
  • Voluntary declaration

Locations We Serve

Multiple offices to help serve you better

With numerous offices across Ontario, we make it easier for our clients to have access to our lawyers. Please note that offices marked with an (**) are satellite offices and require a consultation booked in advance. We are not able to accommodate walk-in appointments at these locations. Call us to book a free consultation today.

Still have family law questions?

Speak to a lawyer

If you need legal advice regarding child custody & access matters in Ontario, contact our Toronto family law lawyers for a free consultation. Some conditions may apply.

Book Your Consult