Opens in a new tab
Gelman Family Law Lawyers

Over 200+ 5-Star Google Reviews

Book Consult

Jamaican Mother Loses Battle to Stop her Child’s Adoption by a Canadian Family

Published: June 15, 2018

Last Updated: March 24, 2026

Book Consult1-844-736-0200

Table of Contents

Jamaican Mother Loses Battle to Stop her Child’s Adoption by a Canadian Family

We’ve previously blogged about a Jamaican mother who had been seeking to stop the adoption of her son by a family in British Columbia.

Recently, following a 4-day hearing, a B.C. Provincial Court judge ruled against the woman, granting custody of the child to the B.C. Ministry of Child and Family Development (the Ministry)

A Brief History

In 2012 the boy (who was then four and is now ten) moved to B.C. to live with his father and stepmother. He had previously been living with his mother in Jamaica. Less than 12 months later, social workers apprehended the boy after he allegedly suffered abuse by his stepmother. He was placed into foster care, and in 2014, the Ministry applied for custody. A trial was scheduled for the spring and summer of 2015.

The mother had been aware of the trial but had indicated that she was unable to attend and had asked the Ministry to return the child to the custody of his father.

However, despite having her contact information (including her address, email, and several phone numbers), the Ministry did not provide her with any documents related to the case, documents that she was entitled to receive. The trial ran in her absence, and the Ministry was awarded custody.

In 2017, with assistance from the Jamaican government, the mother applied to dismiss the custody order and requested that her child be returned to her.

The Second Custody Trial

The trial was held in early 2018 to determine the custody issue. The mother travelled to B.C. to participate.

During that trial, the court heard allegations of physical abuse that the boy had suffered in Jamaica. The court also heard that he had allegedly told social workers and his foster mother that he wanted to remain in Canada.

The court noted that the boy:

…is adamant that he does not want to return to his mother in Jamaica…[h]e has not wavered in his deeply held conviction that he wants to stay with [his foster mother]. When he was told that his mother was seeking a court order to return him, he was inconsolable and angry.

The mother argued that social workers had not investigated the allegations of abuse in Jamaica, and noted that it would be “natural” for the boy to ask to stay with his foster mother because he had not seen his biological mother for more than four years (other than through Skype). The mother also highlighted the challenges she faced in establishing that she could provide a home for him in Jamaica that was as suitable as the one he had in Canada, noting:

No mother from a disadvantaged nation could ever hope to discharge that burden.

The Decision: Best Interests of the Child

The Provincial Court ruled against the mother’s application, citing:

  • the length of time that had passed since the initial custody order was made;
  • the fact that the mother had not attended the initial custody hearing; and
  • the best interests of the child.

The Court further noted that there are provisions in place for the child to continue to have Skype calls with the mother, and for her to travel to visit him in person. The boy’s current foster mother has applied to adopt him. The mother is considering an appeal.

We will continue to follow developments in this case and will provide updates if further information becomes available.

In the meantime, if you have questions about how you can protect your custody and access rights, contact Gelman & Associates. Our goal is to provide our clients with the information and resources they need make informed decisions about their rights and the best interests of their children.

In addition to a comprehensive family law kit that all clients are given during their initial consultation, we also offer live webinars on divorce in Ontario and quarterly “Ask the Lawyer” live webinars. To help you maintain positive mental health during a difficult period, we also offer our clients a free consultation with a psychological professional.

We are conveniently located in six locations throughout Ontario, and are easily accessible by transit and off-highway. Our phone lines are open Monday to Friday from 8 AM to 8 PM. Call us at (844) 736-0200 or contact us online for an initial consultation.

 

Written by Lisa Gelman

Senior Lawyer

Senior Lawyer Lisa Gelman has over 25 years of family law experience and founded Gelman & Associates to provide strategic legal counsel in family law matters concerning divorce, parenting, separation, and more.

Frequently Asked Questions - child custody & access

Ontario law does not specify the age at which a child can decide which parent to live with. At most, the Court may consider the preference of the child but that does not necessarily mean that the Court will act favorably on it. The court will consider the child’s maturity, ability to articulate their desires, and the reasoning behind their views when seeking their opinion.

If a parenting plan is included in your court order under the Divorce Act, the document will be legally binding.

In order to change your child’s last name, you will have to be the child’s parent with legal custody or be the legal guardian of the child. In order to change the child’s last name, you will have to provide notice to anyone who has legal access to the child, and that may include your ex-spouse.

In most cases, the answer is no. However, there can be some exceptions that the mother can build a case upon. These include the father putting the child at risk, non-compliance with the court order, or a history of violence by the father.

Creating a custody plan with a narcissistic ex-partner is a task best left to legal professionals. While there might not be one way to deal with a narcissistic ex, there are things that you can do to turn the tables on a narcissistic co-parent. The best way to prevent problems is to go with no contact or limited contact with your ex-partner and put everything in writing if you must only communicate via email or text message to record statements and harassment.

Let us consider that the “moving away” is relocation and not just a change in residency.

Then, let us qualify that the mother will take your child with her.

If the mother is the primary caregiver of the child, you may oppose the relocation by applying the principles laid down under the Gordon vs. Goertz case. You must present your case strongly as to why potentially cutting your child’s relationship as the primary caregiver is to your child’s best interest. This situation falls under the purview of Section 16.93(2) of the Divorce Act.

If both you and the mother have equal parenting time over your child, the mother of the child has the burden of proof as to why the relocation is for the best interest of your child. This situation falls under the purview of Section 16.93(1) of the Divorce Act.

If there is no Court ordered, approved, or awarded parenting time or separation agreement, as contemplated under Section 16.93(3) of the Divorce Act, the mother has the burden of proof to show that relocation is in the best interest of your child.

Note that even if the burden of proof is not laid upon you, it still recommended that you present a strong opposition to the relocation.

Yes, it is possible for your ex to prevent you from relocating with a child you share, although this will likely plan on your parenting arrangements and decision-making responsibility. If you cannot agree about a relocation, a court will decide based on the child’s best interests.

Generally, you need to provide your ex with 60 days’ written notice of your relocation plan, and you must obtain consent or a court order to move the child. A lawyer can help you navigate this process. Our divorce lawyers will guide you through the application and court order process.

Yes, but they will need to establish paternity, especially if the father and the mother separate. Here are the ways to establish paternity as recognized by the court:

  • Act of birth
  • Presumption of paternity
  • Uninterrupted possession of status
  • Voluntary declaration

Locations We Serve

Multiple offices to help serve you better

With numerous offices across Ontario, we make it easier for our clients to have access to our lawyers. Please note that offices marked with an (**) are satellite offices and require a consultation booked in advance. We are not able to accommodate walk-in appointments at these locations. Call us to book a free consultation today.

Still have family law questions?

Speak to a lawyer

If you need legal advice regarding child custody & access matters in Ontario, contact our Toronto family law lawyers for a free consultation. Some conditions may apply.

Book Your Consult