Gelman Family Law Lawyers

Over 200+ 5-Star Google Reviews

Book Consult

Changes to Decision-Making Responsibility and Parenting Time in Ontario

Book Consult1-844-736-0200

Table of Contents

Changes to Decision-Making Responsibility and Parenting Time in Ontario

We asked Gabrielle Pop-Lazic, a lawyer with Gelman & Associates, some commonly-asked questions about changes surrounding decision-making responsibility and parenting time in Ontario. Please note that this overview is intended as an introductory look into a legal subject, and is not intended as legal advice. If you are seeking legal advice regarding decision-making responsibility and parenting time or another family law matter, we recommend booking a consultation with an Ontario family law lawyer.

Introduction to Decision-Making Responsibility and Parenting Time in Ontario

There are two pieces of legislation governing what used to be called “custody and access” in Ontario. The first is the Divorce Act, federal legislation that oversees matters of parenting time and decision-making responsibility in correlation with a divorce. There is also provincial legislation in Ontario called the Children’s Law Reform Act, which would apply if the parents were never married to one another. 

Shift From “Custody” and “Access” to “Decision-Making Responsibility” and “Parenting Time”

The goal, in family law, is to reduce and eliminate conflict between separating parents. Therefore, the language around what used to be called “custody and access” is changing: it is now referred to as “decision-making responsibility and parenting time.” The terminology of “custody and access” may be seen as suggesting a hierarchy between the parents. By changing the language to “parenting time,” both parents’ time with the children is recognized as significant and important to the children. 

The old term “custody” covered two major aspects:

  1. Who gets to make major decisions for the children?
  2. Where do the children live?

The collaborative language of “decision-making responsibility” addresses the same aspects as “custody.” Under a shared decision-making regime, there has to be discussion, consultation, and agreement between the parents.

Major parenting decisions include:

  • Healthcare
  • Education
  • Religious upbringing
  • Other decisions pertaining to the child’s general health and well-being

“Parenting time” replaces the old concept of a parent’s visitation or access. Historically, in situations where a child was primarily cared for by one parent, the other parent was relegated to the role of an “access” parent, with visitation rights. The change in the law now emphasizes the fact that separated parents are still parents, and that the time each spends with the child is equally significant.

Enforcement of Parenting Time and Decision-Making Responsibility Orders under the New Legislation 

Some of the most difficult conflicts in the family courts involve parenting time, such as a parent who is not being permitted to spend time with their child. The only mechanism that the court has for enforcement is to make court orders. One way to address a chronic breach of a parenting order is to bring a motion for contempt. Essentially, this is a motion asking the court to order a remedy. That remedy can be a monetary fine, or can go to the extent of changing the parenting arrangement. 

If the primary caregiver parent isn’t allowing the child to have time with the other parent, for example, the court may reverse that parenting arrangement and give the other parent the role of primary caregiver. This recognizes that it is in the best interests of the child to have a parent who encourages them to have a relationship with their other parent.

In contempt motions, the court is more interested in re-establishing the relationship between the parent and the child than in punishing the parent who has not allowed that relationship to continue. Often, when one parent brings forward a motion of contempt to enforce a parenting order, the first thing the court will do is give the other parent an opportunity to “purge the contempt” – to correct the behaviour that would otherwise lead to a contempt finding. This can create a frustrating and expensive process for those trying to enforce contempt orders against a parent who is intransigent in their desire to violate them. 

The Need for Ongoing Support and Resources for Families Navigating Decision-Making Responsibility and Parenting Time Issues

Families going through the process of separation have likely never done this before, and do not know how best to proceed. In our initial consultation with new clients, we typically offer an overview of the legal issues they should understand. As part of that education, there has to be a recognition that there is a relatively well-defined range of possible outcomes. 

Parents may say or do things inadvertently that may have an impact on their children. Often, when we see negative consequences, it is not because of alienation or an active intention to harm a relationship between a parent and their child, but arises out of simply not knowing what to do. Education and resources may help parents not only communicate with their children, but also to manage conflicts that arise with the other parent. 

The Future of Decision-Making Responsibility and Parenting Time in Ontario

One issue that has been discussed and debated is whether shared parenting should become the default in matters of decision-making responsibility and parenting time. There are positive and negative consequences to a shift such as this. The law tries to protect children from circumstances where the parents are unable to collaborate, in which case shared parenting may not be the best option. For the time being, shared parenting is not the presumptive outcome in Ontario.

If you have any other questions concerning decision-making responsibility and parenting time in Ontario, or would like to discuss the particulars of your specific case, contact us to schedule a consultation with Gelman & Associates today.

Written by Lisa Gelman

Senior Lawyer

Senior Lawyer Lisa Gelman has over 25 years of family law experience and founded Gelman & Associates to provide strategic legal counsel in family law matters concerning divorce, parenting, separation, and more.

Frequently Asked Questions - child custody & access

It is not uncommon for someone to want to relocate after a divorce. If you still live in the marital residence, the familiar surroundings and memories may be too much for your heart to handle. Or in the process of reinventing yourself post-divorce you may want to take a new job, move closer to your friends and family, or simply wish to start fresh somewhere new. There are many reasons a person may want to move after going through a divorce, however if you have children you will need to think twice before making a big move.

Emotionally, it can be challenging for a child to move to an unfamiliar place. Often, they are most at ease in a familiar environment with access to family and friends. Changing schools, living in a new city or even a new house can be difficult on a child, especially after dealing with the emotional turmoil associated with divorce.

Legally, there are certain implications to relocating away from the current jurisdiction where the children ordinarily reside. Before moving you and the noncustodial parent can negotiate with the absence of a lawyer, a written agreement about the moce and any changes to visitation that may be needed. If you cannot reach an agreement about the move, you then must file an Application/Motion to the court to hear your matter and for a judge to make a decision before you move. Usually the court requires at least 30 days notice to the other parent of your court Application/Motion. It may take longer to reach an agreement with the other parent or get a court order. It is a good idea to give notice of 90 days before the move, as as soon as possible and to consult with a lawyer first. Upon receiving this notice, they can challenge your proposed change of residence or apply for a variation to the existing custody or access orders.

The leading case that sets out the legal test in determining mobility is Gordon vs. Goertz (1996) 2. S.C.R. 27

Similar to any other action involving variation of an existing custody order, the person challenging the relocation has to show that the move will result in a material change in circumstances affecting the child. Once this has been established, a judge will determine the best interests of the child in light of the relevant circumstances. These relevant circumstances include the existing custody and access relationship, the relationship between the child and the custodial parent, the views of the child, and the reason for the proposed change of residence among other circumstances. As with every other custody proceeding, the judges determination will turn on the best interests of the child. The judge’s inquiry is individualized and will involve all factors relevant to the case at hand.

Because mobility has become so easy in today’s society, often separation agreements or custody orders will address relocation and place specific restrictions on changing residences. Non-removal clauses that ban the extra-provincial removal of children without consent of the noncustodial parent. In these cases, the custodial parent who wishes to relocate will have to initiate the action by placing an application with the court.

If you are contemplating a move, you must consider the emotional needs of your child, as well as your former spouse’s right to challenge your relocation. Typically, courts only allow a custodial parent to relocate if the proposed move is in good faith and not intended to frustrate the noncustodial parent’s relationship with the child. Additionally, if a custodial parent relocates, they must be willing to accommodate the noncustodial parent’s access to the child; sometimes this means that the relocating parent will have to pay the additional costs of access.

In sum, if you are a custodial parent, moving isn’t as easy as just loading up the car and hitting the road – but it is still possible.

Yes, but they will need to establish paternity, especially if the father and the mother separate. Here are the ways to establish paternity as recognized by the court:

  • Act of birth
  • Presumption of paternity
  • Uninterrupted possession of status
  • Voluntary declaration

No. Even when the parents are unmarried, divorced, or separated, one parent cannot keep the child from seeing the other unless the court deems it appropriate to the child’s best interests.

Historically, mothers have been more likely to get sole custody of their child in both consent and contested orders, as they are usually the child’s primary caregiver. However, as more mothers also work outside the home, courts could also rule in favor of the father.

The majority of judges strive to make decisions that are in your children’s best interest. Giving full custody to one parent is usually the best option, except in cases with concerns such as child or substance abuse. This typically means keeping in contact with and maintaining relationships with both parents.
You should do everything possible to prepare for the subsequent child custody negotiations, whether you’re a parent seeking full custody or shared custody:
Be honest with yourself about your ability to manage things alone, in terms of practicality, finances, and other factors. You may get the result you want by presenting the strongest case for custody by doing the following:

  • Make a Strategy: If custody is granted, a court will expect you to be ready. Compile thoughtful replies to hypothetical queries posed in court.
  • Speak with people who have gone through the child custody procedure before you. They may provide you advice and tell you what to anticipate.
  • Judges look for proof of a meaningful relationship in addition to making sure you can provide a child’s practical and basic needs. Simply put, be involved in your children’s lives.
  • Continue to pay child support regularly, whether you’re asking the court for full or shared custody. When you start the procedure, you’ll want to make sure you have a strong track record.
  • Keep a detailed log of your visitation schedule. This is a crucial aspect of obtaining child custody. Visitation records reflect how often you see your children under the present arrangements and your dependability, as well as dedication to them.
  • During all child custody hearings, the court will inquire about acceptable living accommodations. Even if you live in a tiny apartment, you should create a unique and secure environment for your child.
  • Courts may determine child custody in part by how you treat your child’s other parent. Being hostile or unpleasant to the other parent makes collaborative decision-making more complicated and can break apart parent-child ties. As a result, judges are more inclined to favor the parent who isn’t behaving badly.
  • While parents typically spend a lot of time thinking about what they believe is best for their children, children’s perspectives are sometimes overlooked. The court will be interested in learning what the children desire and will most likely question them directly at some point throughout the proceedings. You can better inform your decision-making by asking your child what they think.

No. Parenting time and child support are different from each other. While it is a child’s right to be provided with financial support, it is also their right to spend time with their parents. Thus, even if the child support was cancelled the parent formerly supporting can still enjoy parenting time with the child.

“There is no fixed age for when a child can say which parent they want to live with after a divorce. However, by law, a child must be 16 years old to decide on this matter. The exception to this is when there is a court order stating that a child/ren must live with one parent until they turn 17 or 18.

Under certain circumstances, it is possible to legally prevent your child/ren’s father from seeing or contacting them. It may be necessary if he presents a potential danger to your child/ren. If you were never married to the father of your child and there is no court order saying otherwise, you can do anything you want until paternity is confirmed.

Locations We Serve

Multiple offices to help serve you better

With numerous offices across Ontario, we make it easier for our clients to have access to our lawyers. Please note that offices marked with an (**) are satellite offices and require a consultation booked in advance. We are not able to accommodate walk-in appointments at these locations. Call us to book a free consultation today.

Still have family law questions?

Speak to a lawyer

If you need legal advice regarding child custody & access matters in Ontario, contact our Toronto family law lawyers for a free consultation. Some conditions may apply.

Book Your Consult