Opens in a new tab
Gelman Family Law Lawyers

Over 200+ 5-Star Google Reviews

Book Consult

Stepparents and Access to Children

Published: December 4, 2019

Last Updated: March 23, 2026

Book Consult1-844-736-0200

Table of Contents

Stepparents and Access to Children

In today’s world, families are becoming more diverse than ever before. What happens when a stepparent wants access to a child? In a recent case, an Ontario court considered this interesting question when it heard a stepmother’s request for access to a nine-year-old boy.

The Parties’ Story

The mother and father had one child together.

The stepmother and father began living together in March 2009, married in October 2011 and separated in November 2016.

The stepmother had only seen the child four times since she separated from the father.

The stepmother brought an application for access to the child.

The Relevant Legal Principles

The court began by outlining that s. 21 of the Children’s Law Reform Act (the Act) permits a parent of a child, or any other person, to apply for custody of or access to a child. Section 24(1) of the Act provides that a custody or access application will be determined on the basis of the best interests of the child. In considering the best interest of the child, the court must consider:

  • the love, affection and emotional ties between the child and,
    • each person, including a parent or grandparent, entitled to or claiming custody of or access to the child,
    • other members of the child’s family who reside with the child, and
    • persons involved in the child’s care and upbringing;
  • the child’s views and preferences, if they can reasonably be ascertained;
  • the length of time the child has lived in a stable home environment;
  • the ability and willingness of each person applying for custody of the child to provide the child with guidance and education, the necessaries of life and any special needs of the child;
  • the plan proposed by each person applying for custody of or access to the child for the child’s care and upbringing;
  • the permanence and stability of the family unit with which it is proposed that the child will live;
  • the ability of each person applying for custody of or access to the child to act as a parent; and
  • any familial relationship between the child and each person who is a party to the application.

The Court’s Decision

In granting the stepmother’s application, the court found that the stepmother viewed the child as her own and loved him very much. She had been involved in the child’s life since he was one year old and treated him as a member of her family. Unfortunately, the stepmother’s relationship with the child had been compromised by the restriction in access.

There was also an exchange of text messages between the mother and stepmother, which showed that the child missed the stepmother.

The court went on to find that the stepmother had been an important part of providing the child with a stable home environment from May 2009 to November 2016. In addition, the court was satisfied that the stepmother was capable of meeting the child’s needs and would act responsibly in parenting the child.

The court concluded that not letting the stepmother have access to the child would deprive the child of an important relationship. The court faulted the mother and father for restricting thestepmother’s access,stating that:

An important part of responsible parenting is putting your child’s interests ahead of your own. This includes facilitating a child’s important relationships, even when your own relationship with these persons have broken down and this becomes awkward or inconvenient. The mother and father have been failing the child in this area.

The court also found that in light of the fact that the stepmother had assumed a role as a third parent to the child, the mother and father did not have the parental authority to exclude the stepmother from the child’s life. Furthermore, the courtnoted that even if the more stringent “parental autonomy” test was applicable in this case, it would still be in the child’s best interests to have access with the stepmother because:

  • the stepmother had a very important pre-existing relationship with the child;
  • the decision of the parents to deny the stepmother access imperiled that relationship; and
  • the parents were acting arbitrarily and unreasonably.

In the end, the court concluded that it was in the child’s best interests to have meaningful access with the stepmother.

Lessons Learned

If you are a stepparent and formed a settled intention to treat a child as a child of your own, you may be entitled to access. If you have questions about your custody or access rights, it is best to speak with a lawyer. At Gelman & Associates, our lawyers provide exceptional legal representation in all family law matters. Our goal is to always empower clients to make informed decisions about their future. We give all prospective clients a comprehensive family law kit during their initial consultation, as well as a copy of our firm’s handbook on separation and divorce. This information is full of resources that will help you understand and navigate the difficult and often complicated separation and divorce process.

With six offices throughout Aurora, Barrie, Downtown Toronto, Mississauga, North York and Scarborough, we are easily accessible by transit and off-highway. Our phone lines are open Monday to Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Call us at (844) 736-0200, or contact us online to schedule an initial consultation.

 

Written by Lisa Gelman

Senior Lawyer

Senior Lawyer Lisa Gelman has over 25 years of family law experience and founded Gelman & Associates to provide strategic legal counsel in family law matters concerning divorce, parenting, separation, and more.

Frequently Asked Questions - child custody & access

Ontario law does not specify the age at which a child can decide which parent to live with. At most, the Court may consider the preference of the child but that does not necessarily mean that the Court will act favorably on it. The court will consider the child’s maturity, ability to articulate their desires, and the reasoning behind their views when seeking their opinion.

If a parenting plan is included in your court order under the Divorce Act, the document will be legally binding.

In order to change your child’s last name, you will have to be the child’s parent with legal custody or be the legal guardian of the child. In order to change the child’s last name, you will have to provide notice to anyone who has legal access to the child, and that may include your ex-spouse.

In most cases, the answer is no. However, there can be some exceptions that the mother can build a case upon. These include the father putting the child at risk, non-compliance with the court order, or a history of violence by the father.

Creating a custody plan with a narcissistic ex-partner is a task best left to legal professionals. While there might not be one way to deal with a narcissistic ex, there are things that you can do to turn the tables on a narcissistic co-parent. The best way to prevent problems is to go with no contact or limited contact with your ex-partner and put everything in writing if you must only communicate via email or text message to record statements and harassment.

Let us consider that the “moving away” is relocation and not just a change in residency.

Then, let us qualify that the mother will take your child with her.

If the mother is the primary caregiver of the child, you may oppose the relocation by applying the principles laid down under the Gordon vs. Goertz case. You must present your case strongly as to why potentially cutting your child’s relationship as the primary caregiver is to your child’s best interest. This situation falls under the purview of Section 16.93(2) of the Divorce Act.

If both you and the mother have equal parenting time over your child, the mother of the child has the burden of proof as to why the relocation is for the best interest of your child. This situation falls under the purview of Section 16.93(1) of the Divorce Act.

If there is no Court ordered, approved, or awarded parenting time or separation agreement, as contemplated under Section 16.93(3) of the Divorce Act, the mother has the burden of proof to show that relocation is in the best interest of your child.

Note that even if the burden of proof is not laid upon you, it still recommended that you present a strong opposition to the relocation.

Yes, it is possible for your ex to prevent you from relocating with a child you share, although this will likely plan on your parenting arrangements and decision-making responsibility. If you cannot agree about a relocation, a court will decide based on the child’s best interests.

Generally, you need to provide your ex with 60 days’ written notice of your relocation plan, and you must obtain consent or a court order to move the child. A lawyer can help you navigate this process. Our divorce lawyers will guide you through the application and court order process.

Yes, but they will need to establish paternity, especially if the father and the mother separate. Here are the ways to establish paternity as recognized by the court:

  • Act of birth
  • Presumption of paternity
  • Uninterrupted possession of status
  • Voluntary declaration

Locations We Serve

Multiple offices to help serve you better

With numerous offices across Ontario, we make it easier for our clients to have access to our lawyers. Please note that offices marked with an (**) are satellite offices and require a consultation booked in advance. We are not able to accommodate walk-in appointments at these locations. Call us to book a free consultation today.

Still have family law questions?

Speak to a lawyer

If you need legal advice regarding child custody & access matters in Ontario, contact our Toronto family law lawyers for a free consultation. Some conditions may apply.

Book Your Consult